• November 2024

In recent years, automotive and manufacturing industries have made significant strides towards achieving more circular business operations, emphasising sustainability and resource efficiency. Spurred on by sweeping regulatory change such as the End-of-Life Vehicle (ELV) Directive, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are incentivised to create products that contain greater recycled content and are easier to repair, disassemble and recycle at the end of their useful life. On the surface, this approach is seen to conserve resources, aligns with growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products, and paves the way for a more sustainable future.

Whilst significant progress has been made across the segment – the word “circular” now mentioned an average of 22 times in the annual reports of Europe’s five biggest automakers – the in-life portion of the product lifecycle has been largely ignored.

Based on our experience working on this challenge with companies from across the automotive value chain, BearingPoint conclude that retaining control of vehicles throughout their useful life now represents the greatest hurdle to unlocking the potential of a circular business model.

Meanwhile, the in-life stage of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles represents some of the biggest and most immediate returns associated with the move to a circular business model. OEMs that have traditionally focused investment at the beginning and end of their products’ lifecycle must now turn their attention to controlling the in-life stage of their products should they wish to reap the rewards of a circular future.

Design and Manufacture

In lockstep with other industries, the automotive industry has invested in the design of its products and the manufacturing processes it employs to produce them. In recent times, vehicles such as the Volvo EX30 have been launched alongside comprehensive Lifecycle Assessment Reports (LCA). The EX30 LCA report published in March 2024 labours the importance of “cradle-to-gate” carbon footprint analysis[1].  

Whilst the publication of LCAs has proven popular with environmentally minded consumers, industry regulation has also played a role. For example, recently proposed revisions to the ELV Directive stipulate that 25% of plastic incorporated in the design and manufacture of vehicles must be of recycled origin by 2030[2]. Regulatory measures such as this mark a significant departure from previous focus on the “recyclability” of materials and shift attention towards the beginning of the product lifecycle. So much is the pressure for regulators and shareholders, the word “recycle” featured in the annual reports of all of the top five European automakers in 2022 and 2021. Over the same period, the term “in-life” didn’t feature at all.

End of Life

Similarly impressive strides have been taken towards efficient refurbishment, reuse and recycling of vehicles at the end of their lives. A critical enabler for the return-leg of a fully circular product lifecycle, the UK and US are leading the way with regards to deployment of intelligent vehicle recycling.

Charles Trent’s state of the art “reverse production” facility in Poole, UK and My Auto Store’s “disassembly plant” in Camden, New Jersey represent recent advances towards high-efficiency vehicle recycling and reuse. The Trent facility which opened in 2022 helps to ensure that over 95% of every vehicle which it processes is recycled or used to supply a burgeoning market for second hand “green parts”.

Mark Trent

Demand for green parts from end-of-life vehicles has grown year-on-year and shows no signs of slowing. Despite step-change improvement in technology and techniques used to process end-of-life vehicles, demand for green parts outstrips supply, demonstrating the market’s robust appetite and need for continued investment. OEMs must retain greater control of their vehicles during their lifetime to guarantee the feedstock for end-of-life processing facilities like Charles Trent.

Marc Trent, CEO, Charles Trent Limited

In November 2023 Stellantis inaugurated a €40M Circular Economy Hub in Turin Italy. Following the trend of preparing for the end-of-life aspects of a fully circular business model, the Hub, which will employ up to 550 people by 2025, boasts vehicle dismantling capabilities and plays host to a joint venture between Stellantis and Galloo, a leading metal recycling and recovery company.

In Life

Whilst the beginning and end of the automotive product lifestyle are reaping the rewards of prolonged investment, the “in-life” component of the circular business model has been – by relative measures – neglected. Underinvestment in longest stage of vehicle lifecycle runs counter to the revenue opportunities it presents. Providing mobility services to customers using vehicles throughout their useful life stands to benefit a range of different industry players including OEMs, financiers, and mobility service operators (e.g. LeaseCos).

Consequently – and despite abundant opportunity – industry participants are met with significant gaps concerning the capabilities they require to unlock the full potential of a circular business model. Key capabilities to be considered include:

Design for Circularity

Serviceable, Upgradeable, and Recyclable by Design

  • Vehicle design must be used to promote residual value via efficient in-life refurbishment (e.g. modular upgrades, Over-The-Air updates, etc.) and efficient end of first- and second-life recycling.

Continuous Feedback Cycle

  • The right mechanisms to facilitate the provision of feedback about vehicle design and the consequence this has for different in-life use cases must be established between all industry participants (including end-of-life).

Go to Market

“Sales” Model & Go to Market

  • Service providers must identify the right use cases to maximise the utilisation of their vehicle fleet over its entire useable life.
  • As-a-Service mobility offerings led by older vehicles must be paired with tailored and appropriate incentives to make them attractive to customers.
  • Demand generation initiatives must be leveraged to encourage customers to transition from ownership-based mobility to service-based models.
  • The right channels must be used to support chosen go-to market strategies.

Second Life Applications

  • Optimum second-life applications of vehicles and their components (e.g. battery energy storage systems) must be identified at the beginning of a vehicle’s first life.
  • Second life applications must be leveraged to justify improved residual value at the end of a vehicles useful (first) life.

Operational Partnerships

Distribution of Risk

  • Entities best placed to own, market, and operate first- and second-life services must be identified.
  • Partner platforms must be used to distribute risk associated with different parts of a circular business model (e.g. reverse logistics and green parts).
  • OEMs must choose which aspects of fully circular operations they will make (i.e. develop in-house), and which aspects they should buy (i.e. procure from third parties).

Finance

Residual Value (RV) Management

  • OEMs must protect the RVs of their vehicles throughout their useable life.
  • RV setters (e.g. Autovista Group, L’Argus, and cap hpi) must leverage their knowledge of vehicle technology and refurbishment techniques to forecast RVs out to 5, 10, 15 years and beyond.

Long-Term Financing

  • The right structures (e.g. Asset-Backed Securitisation) must be employed to provide long-term financing of vehicles over an extended period.
  • Green finance solutions must be deployed in the context of electric vehicles and circular business models.

Systems & Technology

Long Lifecycle Asset Management

  • The right systems and technologies must be used to manage vehicles fleets and assets over an extended period.
  • Vehicle telematics and other data sources must be used to inform important decisions such as the transition of vehicles from one use case to another.

In Summary – Lessons Learned

As policy concerning the beginning and end of vehicle lifecycles becomes more stringent, industry participants will depend on increased control of vehicles during their lifetime to meet the demands of international regulations. Investing time and energy to address the systems, technology, partnerships, strategy and finance solutions required to operate in-life vehicle services is becoming increasingly important.

Whilst the in-life stage has not benefitted from substantial investment to date, our modelling and experience indicates that it represents significant new revenue and profit opportunities for those who are equipped to service it.

To seize the opportunity that currently faces the automotive industry, whilst mitigating the risks posed by a fast-moving regulatory environment, businesses must consider:

  • A rigorous and structured approach when deciding which new capabilities to develop, and in what order. A diligent and systematic approach will avoid scattergun investment and ensure the near-term promises of a circular business model can be achieved.
  • Effective incubation of capabilities in such a way that enables companies to realise the financial and economic benefits of the move to a circular model in a timely manner (Horizon 1[4]).
  • The development of capabilities in way that can accommodate the transition of all services and products to a fully circular business-as-usual model in the future (Horizon 2 and Horizon 3).

Automotive business must carefully consider, evaluate, and commit to investments which will prepare them for the long term without sacrificing short term benefits – a multi-time-horizon shift.

 

Contributing Authors

Joseph Riou, Senior Business Consultant - joseph.riou@bearingpoint.com 

Would you like more information?

If you want to get more information about this insight please get in touch with our experts who would be pleased to hear from you.

Automotive

From digital mobility to analytics, we help companies in the automotive sector