Fund beyond the pilot and evidence the benefit that lands right across the system, not just one budget
Adults facing multiple disadvantage are a small population with a system-sized challenge. For local authorities and their partners, a coordinated, trauma-informed response can change lives while reducing the cost that lands right across the system.
Multiple disadvantage describes adults experiencing three or more overlapping issues at once — homelessness, substance use, poor mental health, domestic abuse and contact with the criminal justice system. Their needs don’t fit neat service boundaries, so they cycle through a system built for simplicity and too often fall through the gaps.
This is a small cohort that draws heavily on crisis services. The case for acting earlier, and together, is both human and financial.
Sources: National Framework for Action on Inclusion Health (2023); Darzi review of the NHS (2024); national evaluations of multiple disadvantage.
The Changing Futures programme aims to improve outcomes for adults facing multiple disadvantage by promoting greater integration and collaboration across local services and developing strong multi-agency partnerships.
Some systems already have existing Changing Futures programmes in place since 2021, whilst from April 2026, a new 3-year £55.8 million phase of the programme will target 18 of the most deprived areas of the country, with those areas standing up services and approaches over the coming months.
BearingPoint worked alongside a local authority in the South East to develop a sustainable model for multiple disadvantage. Six key learnings emerged from the design of the programme.
Fund beyond the pilot and evidence the benefit that lands right across the system, not just one budget
Agree what good looks like and how it’s measured at the outset, not retrofitted at the end to ensure you are able to evidence benefits
Overlap with other services is the norm. Plan deliberately for how the model joins up with existing services, not duplicates, and co-design and tailoring to local need is key
Coordination and relational outreach do different jobs; the strongest models combine both
A local authority that leads, with system partners aligned, is what we have seen help drive a consistent approach.
A small but high-consuming population that must be built into Integrated Neighbourhood Teams from the start
Adults facing multiple disadvantage are few in number but high in need. Designing for them from the start — within Integrated Neighbourhood Teams, with a local authority leading and system partners aligned — is how systems move from crisis response to sustainable support.
We worked alongside a local authority in the South East to develop a sustainable model for multiple disadvantage, across three workstreams.
We modelled the economic opportunity of a system uniting around this cohort. This included the avoided cost, and where the value lands for each partner.
We built a unified outcomes framework, looking at housing stability, crisis-service contact, offending and wellbeing, so impact is measured consistently.
We tested what good looks like. Multi-agency coordination plus relational, trauma-informed outreach, co-design with lived experience, LA-led with VCSE delivery partners.
We help local authorities and their partners build the financial case, the evaluation framework and the operating model for multiple disadvantage. Contact our UK public sector team to start the conversation.